![]() ![]() That's well short of Apple's "up to 45%" claim, but see above (and don't forget the "up to" weasel words). It should be noted that this change negates some of Snow Leopard's most important installation optimizations, which are focused on reducing random data access from the optical disc.Įven with this disadvantage, the Snow Leopard installation took about 20% less time than the Leopard installation. ![]() To eliminate as many variables as possible, I installed both Leopard and Snow Leopard from one hard disk onto another (empty) one. Still, if Apple's going to make such a claim, it's worth checking out. Installation also only happens once, and it's not really an interesting process unless something goes terribly wrong. Apple claims that Snow Leopard's installation process is "up to 45% faster." Installation times vary wildly depending on the speed, contents, and fragmentation of the target disk, the speed of the optical drive, and so on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |